Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pol Martin Tiffon vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tiffon vs Ficovich analysis and find out who is favored!
Pol Martin Tiffon vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tiffon 1 - 0 Ficovich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tiffon has won 46.54% of points on their second serve, while Ficovich has won 51.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tiffon, in recent form, has won 57.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ficovich has won 52.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.75% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tiffon has saved 57.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ficovich has saved 55.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tiffon has won 60% of matches played (W/L 39/ 26), with Ficovich winning 52.78% (W/L 38/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tiffon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 241/ 149), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 311/ 212), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Tiffon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.35% of matches (W/L 33/ 16), where as Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tiffon winning 1 times and Ficovich being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tiffon winning 2 and Ficovich winning 1. The last match between Tiffon and Ficovich was at the Quito Challenger, 17-09-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Pol Martin Tiffon getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tiffon and Ficovich have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tiffon winning 1 times and Ficovich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tiffon winning 0, and Ficovich 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tiffon has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.22 while Ficovich has played against players with an average rank of 288.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tiffon has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ficovich has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tiffon has converted 42.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ficovich has converted 44.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
437
Rank
235
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
226
Rank
125
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
61% (263-167)
Career Total W/L
57% (356-271)
64% (23-13)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$5,575
Career Prize Money
$243,335
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pol Martin Tiffon | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:28 | 1:31:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (46/77) | 71% (53/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (37/46) | 75% (40/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 55% (12/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (23/75) | 27% (21/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pol Martin Tiffon | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (23/13) | 58% (19/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (49/32) | 55% (41/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (403/340) | 52% (383/348) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (19/11) | 63% (17/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 108 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 142 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:58 | 1:45:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.03 | 267.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1346/2346) | 60% (1348/2235) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (919/1346) | 69% (929/1348) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (467/1000) | 52% (461/887) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (139/324) | 45% (95/213) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1117/2508) | 40% (916/2271) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 57% (13/10) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (20/8) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (23/36) | 58% (19/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 100% (17/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 0% (17/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 13% (16/2) |
Pol Martin Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Iliyan Radulov
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Guy Den Ouden
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
13
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Francisco Rocha
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
82 of
132)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
119
Total Points Won
98
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tiffon Vs Ficovich Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
